On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:02 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
if you don't like the process, propose a patch :-)
The sad fact is that there is a clear disconnect between some of the docs and "normal" practice. This was clear back with the whole CeltixFire fiasco ;) My point has always been that by making it easier to "bypass" the Incubator, it leads us back closer to the situation that the Incubator was 1st created to fix... Lazy consensus is a great way to continue progress without being "hampered" by others being busy or unavailable. It's good for code patches, etc... It should not be good for things which are core to our legal issues (like software releases or IP clearance). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
