On Dec 10, 2006, at 7:57 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 10 Dec 06, at 6:40 PM 10 Dec 06, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Dec 10, 2006, at 5:47 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
We ask that you please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the Felix 0.8.0-incubator release.
[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
BTW, this Veto thing is wrong. I've been meaning to mention it
since several podlings have used this template. It is not possible
to veto a release -- all releases are majority votes. +1 just means
yes and -1 means no.
Really?
I thought that would be considered a technical thing? If you know a
release is getting pushed out when it shouldn't because it's
premature that on technical grounds you could say that it doesn't
meet the requirements of a beta say? Or that it has know flaws and
shouldn't be released?
I honestly thought it was a technical type decision.
As long as 3 people within the PMC attest to its validity, the
release can go out. AFAIK, only a legal veto can block
a release. In most cases, of course, the community listens
and responds to any -1 votes and tries to address them,
if need be. Ignoring -1's is bad form. But with releases,
-1 aren't vetoes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
