But my point is that as part of a release you have to validate *all* the code that you ship in that release. In that code there are logically two things:
1) your own code contributed to this project 2) other code. The other code can be split into: 2a) Released Apache artifacts 2b) Other code. For 2a you can rely on Apache's release procedures and pass the buck. For everything else you have to validate that code. 2b can be split into 2b(i) - non-released Apache code (incubator or TLP) 2b(ii) - Other people's stuff with ASL 2b(iii) - Other people's stuff with another license. But my point is that there really isn't any difference between 2b(i) and 2b(ii). Its code that needs to be validated as part of this release. Paul On 11/17/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, On 11/17/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Doh > > Sorry. My apologies for that. I got carried away with my example. > > I still think the principle applies. I think it's a big difference though. TLPs have proven their merit in following the standard release process. Yoav --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
