Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > It's an implementation of a spec. A single spec that is part of an > external spec-governing ecosystem, the JCP. "Jini" isn't a spec, it's > it's own spec ecosystem. It's not part of the JCP, for example. > > So Apache Jini is like saying Apache JCP (I'm stretching to make a > point...). >
That said, I'd be all for Apache JINI as an experiment to do a spec governance project for JINI, and Apache $FOO as the thing that takes the code being suggested in the proposal. I just wouldn't "cross the beams" at this point. geir --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
