Cliff Schmidt wrote: > I believe all open questions about the Glasgow proposal (originally > submitted as "Blaze") have now been addressed enough to call a vote > for accepting the project for incubation.
Cliff, so it is not lost (I switched subjects to a discussion forum that, oddly, you have not responded to) ... I'm sorry, but respectfully -1 this proposal as written. My specific objection is to the language below, I don't see anything otherwise objectionable in the proposal. [c.f. the Re: Accept Glasgow into Incubator - Spec Terms thread which only Carl has partly responded to.] which is my vote on your call for acceptance. Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
