On 19/07/2006, at 1:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ian Holsman wrote:
isn't Active MQ an alternative to Blaze/AMQP ?
If this project was accepted would Apache have *2* different
messaging servers?
Ant and Maven? Axis2 and XFire? GUMP and Maven Continuum?
I don't see this as a good thing.
how hard would it be for the AMQP protocol to be implemented inside/
ontop of ActiveMQ ?
which use different protocols ?
Blaze is about only AMQP, a proposed standard for interoperable
messaging.
ActiveMQ implements multiple protocols. There is some disagreement
between
AMQP proponents and the ActiveMQ team regarding the desirability of
balkanizing messaging protocols.
if blaze's goal is to create a standardized widely available and
interoperable messaging solution (you forgot enterprise class)
why is it creating a new one, and not using JMS ?
Blaze's goal (AMQP) is to provide multple language implementations
of a
language-neutral, wire-level, protocol with a ton of detailed
semantics for
interoperable messaging. JMS is a a Java API.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ian Holsman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://economychat.com discussion on the economy and economics in
general
