+1 from me.
On 6/29/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/25/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
> ServiceMix community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> 3.0-M2.
>
> We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
> perform the release.
>
> Vote thread:
>
>
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--ServiceMix-3.0-M2-incubating-%28Bis%29-t1833081.html
>
> Vote result:
> 7 +1s and no 0/-1
>
> Release tarball:
>
>
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.0-M2-incubating/m2/org/apache/servicemix/apache-servicemix/3.0-M2-incubating/
>
> Keys file is available at:
>
>
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-3.0-M2-incubating/m2/org/apache/servicemix/KEYS
>
> Releases section of the Incubation Policy:
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
+1 looks ok to me
but note:
1 the various licenses for the jars shipped are present and rationally
organized (good) but are not referenced from the master LICENSE file. check
with the legal policy documentation once (it is posted)
2 there are xml files shipped without copyright notices. it's recommended
that these should contain the boiler plate license
- robert
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://people.apache.org/~dims/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
