Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On 6/11/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Their "real" legal name is only used in cases where it is actually >> legally required. In all other cases, we use their private >> name. This is even the case for things like the member >> attendance records of the foundation, etc... > > > In short, I think that the person should sign the iCLA with their legal > name > (so that it can be bound by force of law) and then note on the iCLA that > all > references to this person should be under 'X'. (Only Jim will see this - > everyone else will see 'X'.) > > FWIW, we have at least one ASF member who uses another name than what their > 'legal' name is. (N.B. I'm fairly sure that he follows this list - if so, > he can chime in.) > > So, it's not a problem for us - until as Jim pointed out, we have to > disclose it - which generally means you're an Officer and at that point, > all > bets are off as to your privacy... -- justin
I am, I suspect, the person in question. As you might guess, Upayavira isn't my legal name, but the one I was given when ordained as a Buddhist. I signed an iCLA with my legal name, and for-warned Jim that I would prefer to be known as Upayavira. He was able to store the ICLA with my legal name, and record the ICLA in iclas.txt using my preferred name. I don't know if that is precisely what is desired by this particular individual though. Regards, Upayavira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
