This is my understanding as well and what was communicated to me by
Incubator PMC people.
Regards,
Alan
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
I think he is talking about having/needing a separate download for
ServiceMix irrespective of whether an incubating jar is in Geronimo or
not.
Basically if one needs servicemix, they get a whole package that has
incubating all over it. Same with derby, if someone needed derby they
won't download Geronimo. They will download Derby. Does not mean that
derby jar should not be in Geronimo. It could be, but needs to be
marked properly (incubating sth or other in the jar name)
Anyway that is my understanding...
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-servicemix-dev/200602.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
On 3/16/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/16/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think there is such a restriction. Where did you come across
that? in other words, who said that?
"we are apparently not allowed to use the incubating ActiveMQ"
See this thread...
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-servicemix-dev/200602.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
I confess that this was a suprise - I'd like clarification if this is
actually really the case. It seems silly for the incubation process to
actually stop other Apache projects using the code.
e.g. I remember us using Apache Derby for a very long time during its
incubation on Geronimo - which resulted in some Geronimo folks contributing
back to Derby; we also considered its releases to be real things we built
software from, not just "milestones". Though I guess back then, Geronimo was
still in incubation itself which is why it was maybe allowed to use
incubating code?
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
