On 15 Mar 2006, at 03:54, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Personally, I do not consider ActiveMQ ready. And I do believe
that it
should be targeting TLP status. It has its own community, is
separately
releasable and useable in many projects, not just as part of a J2EE
server,
and would do better as its own TLP. To reiterate, these are my
views. The
Incubator PMC may share or differ in its collective view.
Just out of interest, who decides on if its going to be a TLP or
Geronimo sub project & how is that decision made?
Keep in mind that I am not saying anything negative about
ActiveMQ. I like
the project.
Great :)
I have had quite constructive discussions with members of the
project about possibly using the project. It simply has a way to
go before
it is ready as a TLP.
What if folks involved in the project & on the Geronimo project don't
want it to be a TLP - at least not for a while yet? e.g. can't we
just use the Geronimo PMC until the time folks want/decide to start
to go TLP? Or is going TLP now mandatory?
For that matter, as others have pointed out, it still
has some way to go in migrating infrastructure, of which JIRA is
only one
issue, and is being addressed.
What other issues are there?
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
