Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > What shall we do then in incubator? Any idea for a productive outcome? > > Switch the incubator to anakia. =) > > FWIW, Brett claims that Maven 2 gives up all of the goofy workflow problems > with Maven 1, but I'm not familiar with it. I'd go with what I know... > > Count me a +1 to anakia, +0 to Maven2. > > If Brett or anyone else who knows m2 can set it up such that it has the > *exact* same workflow as anakia, I'm fine with it. I just don't care what > the technology is - I care that it fits our workflow and isn't a PITA to > use or set up (svn co incubator/site + a JVM is *all* that is needed; *no* > downloading anything else - manual or otherwise). If someone - be it Leo or > whomever - comes along with something better, so be it. -- justin
Beware the overworked single vounteer problem. More people probably know Maven. However the problem is if one single person "sets it up" then there will be issues down the track. Hence my proposal long ago about each project needing a documentation team that takes care: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=incubator-general&m=109444576111598 "each project needs a documentation team" -David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
