Noel, I agree, as we need a better polic/process for IP Clearance, it can't be left to one person. I already insisted on full incubation for the specific issue. Though mind you, i'd love to have some guidelines i can check off of to back up why i think a full incubation is prudent. In this specific case, i think we need a closer look at what's happening given the circumstances and the spectre of a large code base helps reinforce that thought.
thanks, dims On 12/28/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dims, > > > it's been a line in the sand AFAIK, i guess it's Noel's call. > > -1 > > Although that might be technically true, we do things collectively in the > ASF. Mind you, we've not had a process for voting on IP Clearance type > submissions, so that's been a potential loophole. > > > I think we should insist on a full incubation for > > Cherokee/Tomahawk/ADF (whatever it's name is today) > > I responded on the generic issue, but as for this specific submission, I > don't know enough about it, yet. I just got back on e-mail today for the > first time since Friday, so I've got some reading to do. :-) Please feel > free to reply to my e-mail to Martin with your observations, but change the > subject to reflect the specific, rather than general. :-) > > --- Noel > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
