On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 04:51:42PM -0500, Rich Bowen wrote: > Ok, so say we went with X=12. There are 13 projects that fit that > description. Of those, 3 have status updates that date within that X > month timeframe, leaving 10 that, at least to me, appear to be inactive > for more than X months. > > So, say we were to vote on their continuation. Then what? Do we list > them as "failed"? That seems really harsh. Is there another term that > can be used? > I'm not sure that "voting on their continuation" is the correct thing to do, but I would certainly hope that the incubator pmc will take the project up to revision at that point - probably even after 6 months of no apparent activity. Auto terminating after a set period would be too harsh, but reviewing and deciding wether to continue is reasonable.
vh Mads Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
