Ted Leung wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > > The merits of the particular proposal aside
> > We should always be judging the merits of each proposal.
> > Failing to do so might well be part of the problem.
> How is this possible when any other PMC can vote to bring a project
> in without approval of the incubator PMC? Just look at the raft of
> projects being brought in via Geronimo and the WS PMC. There's not
> a thing I can do, regardless of the merits. The only thing I can say
> is whether or not their community is good enough to merit graduation.
When I say "We", above, I meant the ASF. All of the PMCs have a
responsibility to the Foundation. But are you going to say that the
Incubator PMC should be judging the performance of the other PMCs in living
up to their obligations?
> > And we require disclaimers and clear notice that projects ARE in
> > the Incubator. Look at how the folks are complaining that we
> > are trying to make the projects look different by being in the
> > Incubator. They ARE different. And they MUST be Incubator
> > branded, and follow Incubation rules.
> Most people in the world are unaware of the difference between an
> incubated project and an Apache project.
And we have to correct that lack of awareness.
> Roy has also stated that once a project is in the incubator it
> ought to be regarded as an Apache project.
I wouldn't take Roy's comment out of context. I don't believe that he means
it the way that you imply above.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
