-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> >> I think this is a particularly likely scenario when the >> voters-who-count != the project committers -- i.e., where the >> PMC != the committers. Those non-on-the-PMC committers are probably >> going to feel that their votes should count -- but they won't. > > Well, now, whose fault is that?
I'm going to get into a finger-pointing process. Those situations exist; I don't think assigning blame is productive. If they're considered officially pathological, then taking steps to correct those in existence and keep more from spawning would be appropriate. > I understand the concerns, but I still feel that project decisions > should always be made in public. How about if the vote takes place > in private and the announcement includes the final vote naming > those who voted? Or have the voting occur on the public list -- by anonymous vote. - -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBQs1dt5rNPMCpn3XdAQE9DwP/ZyQWXPWsOpBIomBYGB7+9T+/DMZeL/+M ZM6ce8TV5EqSp6s+Pcnld+j3MzWHqAYRFuHonBJxOnvDKVPahGtNscOQrAxTPiGP R1UtHeItPaVMoEKn3ORjCn5JOQ5n8N9p51Z7gfkNO6mPQc8kE+82/C5jSiyYubqZ RC6vO8uQVkw= =76f1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
