+1 for one project (then we'll see what happends :)

-- dims


On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 20:21:33 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Paul Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > I'm /so/ +1 for this (the TLP bit -- you /know/ I'm +1 the rest of it
> > too!) it's making me late for work! My day job involves working for a
> > large enterprise (the largest insurer in the UK). To large
> > organisations like that, visibility is everything, and they would want
> > to see that workflow is being taken very seriously by Apache before
> > buying in (I know this is a bit of a stupid attitude, but such is the
> > way with large companies). To give you an idea of how seriously /we/
> > take workflow, we currently spend several million pounds a year
> > maintaining our own workflow system (developed before the rest of the
> > world 'did' workflow). As you can imagine, we're currently looking to
> > replace this. Right now, the likely candidates are commercial, but it'd
> > be nice to have an alternative.
> >
> > The other reason I'm for a TLP is that I can see a number of other
> > projects that might spring up around this (an Agila plug-in for
> > Eclipse, for example?), and it seems more cohesive to host these all
> > under one well-focused TLP.
> >
> > As ever, just my $0.10.
> >
> > Paul
> > --
> > Paul Russell
> > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > iChat/AIM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> +1 for going forward as one project and for going for a TLP when
> we are ready!
> 
> I already know someone who has a prototype of a BPEL editor (as
> an eclipse plug-in) which we could start with for tooling.
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to