Ashish Srivastava wrote: > Steven Noels wrote: > Noel, I think that there has been some confusion.
Starting with the fact that you were responding to a message from Steven Noels, so it should have been "Steven, I think ..." :-) > The number and profile of committers will be decided by ASF. Actually, by the project's PMC. But what we want to see come out of the Incubator is a diverse community not controlled or dependent upon a single vendor. > > our license permits repackaging and redistribution, so you > > could always redistribute a more commercially labeled > > version of the code through your own website, perhaps with > > some value-added services, bearing in mind that the ASF > > license requires you to link back to us as the originators > > of the code. > I understand that this would mean that the ownership of Replicator > would lie with ASF, and Daffodil (like anyone else) would be free > to 'redistribute a more commercially labeled version of the code > through your own website perhaps with some value-added services, > bearing in mind that the ASF license requires you to link back to > us as the originators of the code.' Is my understanding correct? Yes, if you understand that the ASF would be the "originators" of the Apache distribution (the "us" in the above paragraph). Take a look at xmlbeans.apache.org, and you'll see only a minor reference to BEA. http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon/trunk/CREDITS.txt?rev=30946&root=Ap ache-SVN&view=markup > We will be looking to the db.apache.org project for sponsors > and / or developers. Where do things stand regarding your thoughts about contribution? --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
