On Jul 12, 2004, at 5:39 PM, Brian Behlendorf wrote:

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Brian Behlendorf wrote:

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
why?  if the idea excites people but the code sucks, are we going to
turn it down?
In that case, we might decide to accept a new project into the incubator for the same purpose, but decide not to accept the sucky code.

java.apache.org history shows a long history of failures in incubating projects without code. jakarta doesn't, exactly because we established that rule.


It would be a *major* step back if we lifted that requirement.

Keep in mind that availablility of the code is a requirement during incubation, of course. The question is what's an appropriate bar to set *before* a project is accepted into the incubator.



I can imagine cases where it might be reasonable to suggest such a thing ;)


geir

--
Geir Magnusson Jr                                   203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to