> I'm going to vote -1 here, until the status file is updated > addressing some of the original concerns.
> I'm quite sure that all the concerns *have* been addressed, and > an updated status file will cover all of them. At which point > I'll gladly change this to a +1. We've all said, I believe, that the STATUS file has to be updated. I have no problem with your making an issue of it. > Andrew Oliver raised a specific point [1] that the Java PMC wanted the > incubator to specifically consider community. ACO was raising those issues at a time when the JSR was under NDA. See also: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?TalkPlutoProposal As far as I know, those issues are mooted. More to the point, perhaps, Pluto has been adopted and integrated into the new Portals project, which is asking for its release, and they don't appear to have any Community concerns. Do we have any questions about the TCK availability? In any event, the STATUS file needs to be updated. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
