On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 12:44:40PM +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> The role of Mentor is a self-selecting title (eg. anyone wishing to
> become a Mentor and has the title to be one as described in our policy
> just adds themselves to the projects/index webpage + the project status
> page and joins the PPMC and dev lists.
>
> This means that we can reasonably be sure that *at least* the Mentors
> that have listed themselves on the projects/index page are actually
> following the respective projects.
+1
Who are the set of people who may add themselves to this list?
> This of course does not remove the need to have at least one mentor
> identified in teh project proposal.
I'd like to see as many as possible, but putting strict requirements
(like this) only adds unnecessary red tape.
In my mind, if a project asks to be released from incubation and
hasn't shown any participation by any ASFer, then I'm much less
inclined to vote in favor of release.
> This should satisfy all needs, of accountability and of easiness to join.
>
> I should finally add that we have basically agreed also that the PPMC is
> made of all PMC members and all the committers+landing PMC members, but
> that only the mentors must always be subscribed to the ppmc and dev
> mailing lists.
Yuck, this is terminology overkill. We really need to slow down the
introduction of new words to our glossary, we're going to make the
lawyers jealous. :)
How about this:
The PPMC starts with every Incubator PMC person who wants on
the PPMC. New PPMC members are then voted in by the current
PPMC members.
-aaron
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
