On Thursday, September 18, 2003 5:28 AM, Berin Lautenbach wrote: > G'day Murray, > > The process documentation for this is not yet something you can hang > your hat on. > > However, you can have a look at some previous proposals : > > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ASFProposalPages
+1 These would be good to look at, in addition to the specific ones that Tetsuya already suggested. > > Cliff also started putting some stuff that may be of assistance > together here : > > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?WritingProjectProposals Yes - still just collecting notes and links on the Wiki; I'm sure some actual sentences would be more helpful -- sorry that's not ready yet. Here's my $0.02 on two other issues (one cent each): - In reading the email you wrote to Brian, I felt like you were saying that there probably weren't any IP entanglements, but that it was under the radar enough not to matter anyway. Personally, I think you should do whatever is necessary to ensure Sun has no claims at all. The thing with Apache is that we want to make sure that when some other organization wants to adopt an ASF product, they should feel confident that everything they get strictly complies with the Apache Software License. "Under the radar" isn't enough to make most organizations continue to trust the Apache brand. - You mentioned in a prior post that XNode may have broader application than Xindice, and therefore may be a TLP. You missed the step in between: being a separate subproject of the XML project. If this sounds reasonable to you, I would post to the general list at xml.apache.org. Good luck! Cliff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
