On 7/29/2003 3:06 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:

On 7/29/03 2:11 PM, "Ted Leung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



On 7/29/2003 10:33 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:



On 7/29/03 1:01 PM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:





That is an excellent idea.





Why are you blaming the XMLBeans guys for your not having your act
together?  It's all well and good for them to introduce themselves, but
that's not what is holding us up right now.  Right now, we're held up
because we don't  have a public mailing list where we can see whether
their behavior matches their talk.  They can say all they want about how
they want to work as a community and allow non BEA developers and so
forth, but we need to see them doing that.  I thought that was the point
of incubation.




Ted,


Perhaps you didn't mean to reply to me, rather Nicola Ken.


I was replying to a bunch of people in one e-mail. In the section above, I was in fact replying to Nicola Ken.

You do realize that I'm neither a member of the Incubator PMC nor do I
support its existence. Create the mail list. The name shouldn't be up to
the Incubator, it should be up to the XML PMC. Its you're baby, you're
birthing it. Right now you're forced to do it here.


I already asked infrastructure@ for this.

You're a member, call for its dissolution.  Unfortunately, there is still a
contingent of people that like the idea (regardless of its unsuccessful
implementation) so I doubt you'll get consensus to dissolve it.  More than
likely you'll be chided on how you should JOIN the Incubator PMC...


I'm going to see if its possible to get the XMLBeans guys through this thing. And we're going to document the
whole experience so that we have a case if it becomes necessary to go to the board and members to cut this thing down.


Ted


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to