Paul Hammant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > Sorry to be a nag, but are these all just autogenerated from > > javadoc? Surely javadoc output need not be in CVS. > > > > -aaron > > Stricktly speaking, there is no need at all for a xxx-site CVS module > for any Apache projects. You could build the lot to the dir it will be > served from. > > Anyone step in with policy for Javadocs for Incubator?
Well, I'd hate to start composing policy without a little more background on what's going on. First, is there a good reason to have these generated javadoc/jars in CVS if someone can build them? If we need to make the jars available to the public, then I would suggest a nightly builds directory. The rule that I've always followed WRT version control is that derived products are never placed under VC--it's redundant. But there may be a good reason to store javadoc/jars in VC, and if there is I'd like to hear what it is. -Fitz -- Brian W. Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.red-bean.com/fitz/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
