Andrew C. Oliver wrote:

You can integrate with Gump regardless of Maven. Its just configuring gump is a royal pain in the butt.

Pppbbbttt.


Apparently creating the following is beyond Andy's abilities:

http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/jakarta-gump/project/jakarta-tapestry.xml?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain

In any case, this is just a *starter* definition. What needs to be added is lines for each dependency and for each property that needs to be overridden. The way I generally approach this is to start with a minimal set and then add only what is absolutely necessary until I get to a failure that I can't get past.

In this case, I didn't get very far. The build aborts quickly unless jboss is present.

Once this is resolved, I am willing to help. Or you can update the project definition directly. Or you can ask for help on [EMAIL PROTECTED] there are plenty of friendly people there.

Meanwhile, you should get daily reminders that this is not complete delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-)

I figured
that if Maven is Gump-integrated then it should be easier to mavenize and take advantage of maven's gump integration.

Maven has code which will produce a gump descriptor, but no code that will consume one. Conversely gump has no code for producing or consuming Maven descriptors, though Jason has offered to help out by writing a sax based parser for the Maven descriptor.


In short, Maven integration can help with Gump integration, but at the present time, the reverse is not true.

- Sam Ruby


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to