hboutemy commented on PR #6: URL: https://github.com/apache/attic/pull/6#issuecomment-2840837917
looks pretty ok to me (with bdf1c5d small fix): once in the `apache/attic` main branch, the build should not fail: in the context of the PR, I'm even surprised the build is triggered, but happy it did not commit to actual `asf-site` and `cwiki-retired` branches, as it would have published the content comparing the build output branches (asf-site and cwiki-retired branches) of current Velocity attic with Niall's content: - attic Velocity = https://github.com/apache/attic/tree/asf-site and https://github.com/apache/attic/tree/cwiki-retired - Niall's Jekyll = https://github.com/niallp/attic/tree/asf-site and https://github.com/apache/niallp/tree/cwiki-retired there is only one surprising change in cwiki-retired commit that would need investigation: see https://github.com/niallkp/attic/actions/runs/14747163631/job/41396600741 ``` delete mode 100644 AAREADME.txt delete mode 100644 apex.txt delete mode 100644 tuscanyxdoc1x.txt delete mode 100644 tuscanyxdoc2x.txt ``` is the deletion of apex, tuscanyxdoc1x and tuscanyxdoc2x intentional? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@attic.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
