On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 at 15:42, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 at 12:27, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 at 09:32, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I think it is a good replacement for the current site, and seems to > > > have all the existing features. > > > Builds are quick and work well (but will need adjustment for the live > site) > > > > > > There is a fix I think is needed: > > > The list of retired projects will only get longer. > > > > > > At present when the LH drop-down is opened, the Event logo does not > > > have enough room. > > > > > > > We can look at moving it after the sites live. > > > > > > > It's also quite awkward having to scroll down the list. > > > > > > I think it might be better to have a multi-column table of project > > > names, as is done here: > > > https://www.apache.org/#apache-project-list > > > > > > > IMO its best to use the tools in the way that they're designed. With the > > "JustTheDocs" theme you just have to set a "title" and (optionally) a > > "parent" attribute and the Sidebar navigation just works. So for me, I > > think we should keep it. > > > > Additionally, we also now have "Site Search", and a "Retired Projects" > page > > which people can also use to navigate to projects - as well as the menu > on > > the left. > > > > I think we should go live with what we have at the moment and discuss > this > > after. One possible option: > > > > I just added a "project_type" attribute, so we can now distinguish > between > > PMCs and Subprojects - one option would be to have PMCs/Subprojects under > > separate menus and pages > > > > > > > Sebb > > > P.S I hope to have the replacement for retired.py ready soon; it's > > > mostly working. > > > > > > > For now we can copy the project YAML template, fill in the details and > > committing it directly - so don't think we need to wait for this to go > > live, > > It's not filling in the details that is the hard bit - it's finding > the values to use. > > I thought the point of a replacement was not to lose any functionality. >
This was never discussed - as a generalization I would agree, but I think the functionality we gain would far offset any loss. > Can you not wait a day or two more? > Why? We don't have any projects that currently need to be setup. The next board meeting is 3 weeks away AND its not time critical anyway. Its not required for the Website to be fully functional - so no need to delay for it. My plan is to create a PR today for the new website and hopefully get agreement to put it live asap. > Also, I think the existing site needs to be kept available online for > comparison for a while after any replacement is performed. > The existing site could be copied to a staging/preview site. > Good idea - just copy the generated asf-site branch to a new name & configure it as staging. Niall > > Niall > > > > > > > On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 at 07:20, Herve Boutemy <hbout...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > ah ok, I completely misunderstood that it was more a fork of > > > attic-jekyll-site than a Git repo just for a theme :) > > > > > > > > I love this site layout, with Attic color scheme: I think it is ready > > > for preparing a PR to our ASF attic Git repo > > > > > > > > thanks everybody for the great work > > > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > > > On 2025/04/28 20:53:58 Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 at 20:24, Herve Boutemy <hbout...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > do we really need a separate Git repo just for that? > > > > > > I suppose you just configured the JustTheDocs, not really > modified > > > it, > > > > > > isn't it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I created the repo from the JustForDocs template - just to have a > look > > > & > > > > > play with it. After that, I thought I would just the site I'd > built in > > > the > > > > > other repo to see how it worked (if it didn't work well or look > good I > > > > > could then just discard it). Anyway, so yes, didn't need a separate > > > repo - > > > > > but thats just how it ended up > > > > > > > > > > Niall > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2025/04/28 02:40:00 Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > > > > > I've fixed a number of things: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/niallkp/attic-justthedocs/commit/58326153cdae4ab5c091dba021cdfe4a90009a6b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Niall > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 at 14:34, Niall Pemberton < > > > niall.pember...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Theres still some stuff todo with this website, but its > mostly > > > minor. > > > > > > The > > > > > > > > main question is whether overall this is an acceptable > > > replacement for > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > current Attic website - both from a "Look & Feel" perspective > > > and the > > > > > > > > overall mechanism for retiring projects (i.e. using YAML > files > > > for > > > > > > retired > > > > > > > > project data to drive the website generation)? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NIall > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 at 11:53, Niall Pemberton < > > > > > > niall.pember...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I've had a play with using the JustTheDocs Jekyll Theme[1] > with > > > the > > > > > > new > > > > > > > >> website[2] - you can take a look at it here (still a work in > > > > > > progress): > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> https://niallkp.github.io/attic-justthedocs/ > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> One of the nice things is that it comes with search, I like > the > > > menu > > > > > > down > > > > > > > >> the LHS and it has a mechanism to have a copy button on our > > > template > > > > > > text > > > > > > > >> (see resolution page, other pages are TODO) > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Niall > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> [1] https://just-the-docs.github.io/just-the-docs/ > > > > > > > >> [2] https://github.com/niallkp/attic-justthedocs > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
