On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 11:29, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Danny Angus is asked the following on INFRA-26723[1]: > > "@niallp why is the list limited to those projects? If the Attic PMC have > identified a valid need to maintain any attic'd project, shouldn't the > attic PMC just have write access to all attic'd projects by default?" > > Do we want write access to all Git repos going forward or just the list > below temporarily?
I think it's better to limit write access to when it is actually needed. We don't have to worry about accidental (or deliberate) changes to sites/code if they are read-only. > Niall > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26723 > > > On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 at 00:23, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > How do we proceed with getting write access to the project websites using > > Git (for ATTIC-234 & ATTIC-235)? Should I create an Infra ticket for this? > > > > Once they are R-W, I can create PRs for the changes. > > > > Thanks > > > > Niall > > > > Below is the list of repositories: > > > > apex-site > > archiva-web-content > > aurora-website > > bahir-website > > hawq-site > > metron > > mxnet-site > > polygene-website > > streams > > trafodion-site > > usergrid > >
