On 28 April 2018 at 11:52, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]> wrote: > ok for me > > IIUC, the Buildbot configuration that Sebb started can work from Git source as > well as from svn: that's great > > one thing that we should do IMHO would be to better separate source from > generated output: only source should go to Git, and generated html should be > elsewhere
Generated site must be in Git or SVN > this means that docs/flagged content, which is currently added directly in > docs > directory should simply be copied to xdocs and edited from there: the build.sh > copies the content to docs, then the result will be the same. This will just > give cleaner separation between source and generated spaces Agreed that editable source should go in one directory and generated stuff in another. However I disagree that docs should not be in Git as impled above. > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 26 avril 2018, 08:28:58 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit : >> Hi >> >> Any objections against moving attic to git ? >> >> using github enables online file editing/committing, and thus removes the >> need for terminal access. >> >> I have not found similar possibilities with svn. >> >> I will let this be open until 2 may, and then continue of course unless we >> have an open discussion. >> >> rgds >> jan i >> Sent from my iPad > >
