I look into the code, and find that the kick() function in
VirtIO9PBase::sendRMsg function in fs9p.cc is defined in class VirtIODeviceBase:
class VirtIODeviceBase : public SimObject
{
public:
typedef uint16_t QueueID;
typedef uint32_t FeatureBits;
/** This is a VirtQueue address as exposed through the low-level
* interface.\ The address needs to be multiplied by the page size
* (seems to be hardcoded to 4096 in the spec) to get the real
* physical address.
*/
typedef uint16_t VirtAddress;
/** Device Type (sometimes known as subsystem ID) */
typedef uint16_t DeviceId;
BitUnion8(DeviceStatus)
Bitfield<7> failed;
Bitfield<2> driver_ok;
Bitfield<1> driver;
Bitfield<0> acknowledge;
EndBitUnion(DeviceStatus)
typedef VirtIODeviceBaseParams Params;
VirtIODeviceBase(Params *params, DeviceId id, size_t config_size,
FeatureBits features);
virtual ~VirtIODeviceBase();
public:
/** @{
* @name SimObject Interfaces
*/
void serialize(CheckpointOut &cp) const override;
void unserialize(CheckpointIn &cp) override;
/** @} */
protected:
/** @{
* @name Device Model Interfaces
*/
/**
* Inform the guest of available buffers.
*
* When a device model has finished processing incoming buffers
* (after onNotify has been called), it typically needs to inform
* the guest that there are new pending outgoing buffers. The
* method used to inform the guest is transport dependent, but is
* typically through an interrupt. Device models call this method
* to tell the transport interface to notify the guest.
*/
void kick() {
assert(transKick);
transKick->process();
};
But not define in MmioVirtIO and PciVirtIO as you mentioned.
So should I declared in the kick() definition?
void kick() {
EventQueue::ScopedMigration migrate(eventQueue());
assert(transKick);
transKick->process();
};
发件人: Gabe Black [mailto:[email protected]]
发送时间: 2021年3月16日 13:55
收件人: Liyichao <[email protected]>
抄送: gem5 users mailing list <[email protected]>
主题: Re: [gem5-users] gem5 crash when mount by vio-9p protocol in KVM mode with
more than 1 core
Yes exactly, did that help?
Gabe
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:29 PM Liyichao
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Gabe:
You mean that the code to be modified just like this?
void
PciVirtIO::kick()
{
DPRINTF(VIOIface, "kick(): Sending interrupt...\n");
EventQueue::ScopedMigration migrate(eventQueue());
interruptDeliveryPending = true;
intrPost();
}
void
MmioVirtIO::kick()
{
DPRINTF(VIOIface, "kick(): Sending interrupt...\n");
EventQueue::ScopedMigration migrate(eventQueue());
setInterrupts(interruptStatus | INT_USED_RING);
}
发件人: Gabe Black [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
发送时间: 2021年3月16日 8:44
收件人: Liyichao <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
抄送: gem5 users mailing list <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
主题: Re: [gem5-users] gem5 crash when mount by vio-9p protocol in KVM mode with
more than 1 core
I think what you want to do is in the kick() functions in MmioVirtIO and
PciVirtIO, you want to declare a ScopedMigration at the start of the function,
and pass its constructor the result of the eventQueue() method. The SimObject
class inherits from EventManager and knows what event queue it's supposed to
use, and that's what eventQueue returns. When you declare a ScopedMigration, it
will handle the locking correctly and move over to that queue, and when it goes
out of scope (at the end of the function) it will put everything back.
Please give that a try, and if it works for you (I don't have a way to test it
myself) put up a review so we can get a fix checked in.
Gabe
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 5:28 PM Liyichao
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thanks for your explaination.In<https://explaination.In> O3 type with
multi-core 9P is ok.
发件人： Gabe Black<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
收件人： gem5 users mailing list<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
抄送： Liyichao<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
主题： Re: [gem5-users] gem5 crash when mount by vio-9p protocol in KVM mode with
more than 1 core
时间： 2021-03-16 07:24:15
I haven't looked at the code yet, but this is probably because the v9
implementation is getting asynchronous input which might be received by one
thread, which then tries to schedule an event on an event queue associated with
another queue. Most of the time this is not an issue since gem5 is usually
single threaded, but when using multiple cores with KVM, each core runs in its
own thread. There's a way to add events to the event queue in another thread
safely (ScopedMigration) which I'm assuming the v9 code is not using.
Gabe
On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 8:38 PM Liyichao via gem5-users
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi All:
When I use –vio-9p with fs_bigLITTLE.py, 1 core the mount cmd was ok,
but more than 1 core, mount cmd will cause GEM5 crash
1core:
Gem5 cmd: ./build/ARM/gem5.opt --debug-flags=Exec -d
/home/l00515693/m5out configs/example/arm/fs_bigLITTLE.py --cpu-type=kvm
--kernel=vmlinux --machine-type=VExpress_GEM5_V1
--disk=expanded-aarch64-ubuntu-trusty-headless.img --caches
--big-cpu-clock=2.6GHz --little-cpu-clock=2.6GHz --big-cpus=1 --little-cpus=0
--mem-size=4GB --param 'system.realview.gic.gem5_extensions = True'
--bootscript=./test.rcS --vio-9p
Mount cmd in guest OS: mount -t 9p -o
trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L,aname=/home/l00515693/m5out/9p/share gem5 /mnt/9p
root@charlie:~# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/root 9.9G 3.3G 6.2G 35% /
devtmpfs 2.0G 4.0K 2.0G 1% /dev
none 4.0K 0 4.0K 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
none 396M 52K 396M 1% /run
none 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock
none 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /run/shm
none 100M 0 100M 0% /run/user
gem5 2.9T 1.8T 989G 65% /mnt/9p
2core:
Gem5 cmd: ./build/ARM/gem5.opt --debug-flags=Exec -d
/home/l00515693/m5out configs/example/arm/fs_bigLITTLE.py --cpu-type=kvm
--kernel=vmlinux --machine-type=VExpress_GEM5_V1
--disk=expanded-aarch64-ubuntu-trusty-headless.img --caches
--big-cpu-clock=2.6GHz --little-cpu-clock=2.6GHz --big-cpus=2 --little-cpus=0
--mem-size=4GB --param 'system.realview.gic.gem5_extensions = True'
--bootscript=./test.rcS --vio-9p
Mount cmd in guest OS: mount -t 9p -o
trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L,aname=/home/l00515693/m5out/9p/share gem5 /mnt/9p
GEM5 crash info:
gem5.opt: build/ARM/sim/eventq_impl.hh:40: void
EventQueue::schedule(Event*, Tick, bool): Assertion `when >= getCurTick()'
failed.
Program aborted at tick 476281849910020
--- BEGIN LIBC BACKTRACE ---
./build/ARM/gem5.opt(_Z15print_backtracev+0x40)[0xaaaadd24e418]
./build/ARM/gem5.opt(_Z12abortHandleri+0x5c)[0xaaaadd25efa4]
linux-vdso.so.1(__kernel_rt_sigreturn+0x0)[0xffff9fea5688]
/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(raise+0xb0)[0xffff9f6634f8]
--- END LIBC BACKTRACE ---
Aborted (core dumped)
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe send an email to
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
