Hi,
This is described in https://gdal.org/development/rfc/rfc8_devguide.html
. I've submitted https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/9689 so it is going
to be linked to
https://gdal.org/development/dev_practices.html#making-changes-to-gdal
I'd probably agree that at my beginnings in GDAL, I might have felt
unfamiliar with the Hungarian notation, but now I've fully internalized
it, so I hardly notice it. It would be interesting to have opinions of
other developers if they find it inconvenient/a hurdle, are neutral or
like it. The thing is that if we decide to no longer use it, the
inconsistency of mixing free style naming and Hungarian notation might
be problematic and make code confusing. We should probably aim at being
consistent at least at the scope of a given function or file.
Even
Le 17/04/2024 à 15:48, Andrew Bell via gdal-dev a écrit :
Hi,
I was going to make some changes to some GDAL code and I generally
want to follow along. I see that most of the code is still using
Hungarian notation for identifier names. I haven't seen this anywhere
else in like 20 years.
Is it OK to submit code without this naming convention or do we still
think it's important. I didn't see an RFC or documentation that covers
this, but there's lots so I may have missed it.
Thanks,
--
Andrew Bell
andrew.bell...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
