Greg,
I see that now. I expected to be able to read the README in autotest
and understand the big view of testing. It feels like autotest is sort
of a separable part of gdal not being in the tarball.
People who build GDAL from sources in scripts (Docker images etc) just
need the sources. So a tarball with tests included is much larger than
needed for their purposes
The tests should match the code, so 3.3.2rc2 tests run against 3.3.2rc2
code.
So is it helpful to file a doc bug, or are you inclined (since you
actually understand the test plan) to adjust the README.md?
Seemed pretty obvious to me that you should use the gdalautotest-X
version that matches the gdal-X one :-) Feel free to submit pull
request(s) with documentation improvement that makes sense.
setdevenv.sh? Adding some sort of `make test` might be a cleaner approach
though.
Yes, in general I take the view that it's good if a project meets the
standard interfaces so that people don't have to understand anything
about the project's test setup to run it.
When we'll switch to cmake, hopefully people will just have to run ctest
. I don't think we want to invest more currently in improving the
current GNUmakefile based infrastructure with a make check target
I was really coming at this from the point of view that normally a
package lists required dependencies and optional dependencies, and I had
no idea what would happen if one were missing.
As its name suggests, whatever is in autotest/requirements.txt is
required. If some components are missing, anything can happen at runtime.
[Now I see that osr tests fail with a warning about env if this is
missing, but really the test should be skipped or hard fail and not
run without the env.]
Yes, I think it should hard-fail
Should I file a bug? What I got was
/home/n0/gdt/SOFTWARE/GEO/GDAL/gdal/autotest/osr/osr_pci.py:200: AssertionError
=============================== warnings summary ===============================
../../../../../../../../usr/pkg/lib/python3.8/site-packages/_pytest/config/__init__.py:1233
/usr/pkg/lib/python3.8/site-packages/_pytest/config/__init__.py:1233:
PytestConfigWarning: Unknown config option: env
self._warn_or_fail_if_strict(f"Unknown config option: {key}\n")
-- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/warnings.html
which I think led to testing without the env var.
It's just that you didn't install pytest-env.
It does, but I didn't understand how to solve my issue, which is a
python segfault (likely in gdal binary code loaded in a module, I
speculate without basis) that ended the entire test run. I worked
around that my removing ogr/ogr_mitab.py and rerunning.
Once you've installed all requirements, would be interesting to retry
again. In some cases, Python failures can become segfaults due to
unexpected bad use of C API, particular for tests that are
interdependent as Robert mentioned. What can happen sometimes is that
when unexpected test failures happen, some temporary files in the
autotest/xxxx/tmp files remain, and cause subsequent test runs to fail.
Some manual cleaning might be needed.
I also saw things like
ERROR 1: Driver GTM is considered for removal in GDAL 3.5. You are
invited to convert any dataset in that format to another more common one
.If you need this driver in fut ure GDAL versions, create a ticket at
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal (look first for an existing one first) to
explain how critical it is for you (but the GDAL project may still
remove it), and to enable it now, set the
GDAL_ENABLE_DEPRECATED_DRIVER_GTM configuration option / environment
variable to YES ERROR 1: GPSTrackMaker driver failed to create
tmp/testogr2ogr21.gtm
and I wonder if the tests should be setting
GDAL_ENABLE_DEPRECATED_DRIVER_FOO.
Alternatively those tests could be in a separate driver file and not
normally invoked.
Will not happen once pytest-env is installed, since autotest/pytest.ini
does set those environment variables
Even
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev