Updated download links following Sean's proposed directory naming
convention:
https://download.osgeo.org/gdal/3.3.2rc3/gdal-3.3.2rc3.tar.xz
https://download.osgeo.org/gdal/3.3.2rc3/gdal-3.3.2rc3.tar.gz
https://download.osgeo.org/gdal/3.3.2rc3/gdal332rc3.zip
This surprised me - I thought the comment was about the directory name
in the unpacked set of files, not the URL. From my viewpoint not having
the rc in the dirname was good, because the rc is not in the unpacked
dirname. (It also surprised me to be happening at rcN stage, but that's
not important.)
Ah I missed that part of Sean's message. Well, yes, we can't change the
directory name in the RC, since the RC packages are supposed to be
candidates for final ones. And actually when promotting a RC to final,
we just rename the .zip / .tar.gz, so its content is bit-to-bit
identical to the RC.
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
