Thanks, that’s exactly the info I needed to get oriented. -Matt
From: Idan Miara <i...@miara.com> Sent: March 26, 2021 5:29 AM To: Matt.Wilkie <matt.wil...@yukon.ca> Cc: gdal dev <gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: RFC 78: gdal-utils package Hi Matt, Point noted. I've updated the Summary section: Idan Summary This RFC suggests to put all the GDAL python modules (formly scripts), except from the GDAL core SWIG bindings, into their own distribution on pypi. The GDAL python sub-package osgeo.utils (introduced in GDAL 3.2) would be renamed into a package named osgeo_utils. The standalone python scripts from GDAL <= 3.1 were transformed to osgeo.utils in GDAL 3.2. For backwards compatibility these scripts still exist and function as tiny wrappers around the python modules. Users of these scripts would not be effected from this RFC as the scripts would continue to function in GDAL 3.3 in the same way as in GDAL <= 3.2. To allow maximum backwards compatibility, The osgeo package (which includes the GDAL core SWIG bindings) and the osgeo_utils package will continue to be distributed in a single sdist named gdal in pypi. In addition, a new pure python wheel distribution named gdal-utils will be available in pypi under the name gdal-utils. This will allow users who wish to upgrade the utils without upgrading the bindings to do so with pip install --upgrade gdal-utils (see more details in the following sections). On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 00:11, mhw-at-yg <matt.wil...@yukon.ca<mailto:matt.wil...@yukon.ca>> wrote: Having been away from gdal-dev for some years, happily existing as an end of the line tool only user, and only recently re-engaging with the development community I have nothing to say on the strength and validity the RFC. I would like to comment though that it doesn't have a high altitude overview and say what gdal-utils is and where to look at it now. For instance is it all the files in ./gdal/swig/python/scripts/? or gdal/swig/python/osgeo/? or even gdal/swig/python? or somewhere else I haven't looked yet. It needn't be a lot words (there's so much there already it's hard for a newcomer like me to make out the structural bones). One sentence and a link would probably do it. I am excited about the prospect of a gdal-utils sub project, whether it remains within the core repository or is carved off into it's own. It would be a named place where my skills have a chance of contributing little somethings, and I could easily ignore the much larger set of things I don't understand in GDAL proper. ;-) cheers, ----- -Matt -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GDAL-Dev-f3742093.html _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org<mailto:gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
