[Keeping on list] The Daffodil framework may be relevant. https://github.com/DFDLSchemas/NITF And http://dfdlschemas.github.io/
Brad -----Original Message----- From: Doug Gastonguay-Goddard <d...@riverloopsecurity.com> Sent: Wednesday, 6 May 2020 9:00 AM To: Brad Hards <br...@frogmouth.net> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Example NITF files with TRE Thanks a lot, I'll have a look through the resources. I think that's exactly what I'm looking for. Working on a parser / mutator framework that will support a lot of different formats. Using NITF to work through some of the design. It's a lot higher level of just "can we chunk out this feature" rather than understanding how every field is going to affect rendering. Right now I'm just making sure all my structures are implemented correctly. On 5/5/20, Brad Hards <br...@frogmouth.net> wrote: > I assume you know gdal already has a parser, and that for some > commercial or technical reason you need to write your own. > > My test resources are at > https://github.com/codice/imaging-nitf/tree/master/shared-test-resourc > es/src/main/resources > - clearly some overlap with yours. > > I'm not aware of any (public) use of RES, and there will be TREs and > DES that are never public. > You might need to use gdal (or my equivalent approach) to create files > for some of the newer TREs/DESs (e.g. those using gzip compression). > > Brad > > -----Original Message----- > From: gdal-dev <gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org> On Behalf Of Doug > Gastonguay-Goddard > Sent: Wednesday, 6 May 2020 7:27 AM > To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > Subject: [gdal-dev] Example NITF files with TRE > > Hey, I have gotten pretty good coverage from Spacenet, WPAFB-2009, and > the Geospatial Working Group test files. I am wondering if anyone has > a public source for NITF files with DES, RES, or TRE. I am writing a > parser and it is always nice to have an example to validate my interpretation > of the spec. > > There might be some in the datasets I have that I missed. I know there > is a trailing header example I have not gotten to supporting yet. > > Thanks, > Doug > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > > _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
