+1 If possible: Rather than deleting old pages, they should link or redirect to the new location at there are many places that link to the old locations.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 4:46 AM Jeff McKenna <jmcke...@gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote: > Hi Even, > > I agree with emptying the old wiki page and placing a link there, to the > new site. Soon we should also disabling editing on that trac instance > as well (as we discussed here before). > > -jeff > > > > On 2019-05-23 7:05 PM, Even Rouault wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Other projects like MapServer or PROJ have their RFCs as part of their > Sphinx > > documentation, so I've prepared the migration of GDAL RFCs as well (*) in > > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/1567 > > > > Questions: > > - OK with that ? > > - if so, what should we do with https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/RfcList. > My > > thinking would be to empty the content of this page and just put a link > into > > it to the equivalent https://gdal.org/development/rfc/index.html , and > leave > > the individual existing rfc documents without any pointer to them. > > > > Even > > > > (*) using the convert() method of > > > https://github.com/moimael/trac-to-gitlab/blob/master/trac2down/Trac2Down.py > > to convert from Trac wiki to github markdown and then pandoc to convert > to > > ReST + some manual tweaking > > > > > -- > Jeff McKenna > MapServer Consulting and Training Services > https://gatewaygeomatics.com/ > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- -- http://schwehr.org
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
