On lundi 30 octobre 2017 10:54:56 CET Ari Jolma wrote: > Ari Jolma kirjoitti 24.10.2017 klo 17:07: > > Whoa! How hard can XML be? I have a real Capabilities document (from > > well known company) which defines *both* default and ows namespace to > > http://www.opengis.net/ows/2.0. > > Seems that XML is actually much harder than that :) > > XML namespaces can be declared in any element and then they are in > effect in that element and in all of its children unless they override > the namespace declarations. > > For example Rasdaman seems to write XML like that. > > I'm wondering how much benefit there is from looking into the namespaces > in WCS responses. Probably not much in practise. Not a lot of benefit > from a lot of work if I implement those rules.
Yes, XML can be a pain. Did you see my past suggestion of just stripping all namespace prefixes from elements with CPLStripXMLNamespace(psRoot, NULL, TRUE) ? I don't expect namespace ambiguities in the case of decoding WCS GetCapabilities or GetCoverage responses. -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
