Hi, This query is based on extending the feature support mentioned in this thread https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2016-May/044419.html
GDAL Sentinel driver doesn’t support calibration as of now. Right now we have an implementation for sigma calibration with GRD datasets. We are using this reference: https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/685163/S1-Radiometric-Calibration-V1.0.pdf We would like to support full calibration capability and here are our idea on how the architecture would be. Please forward your suggestions on the same. Option 1: Subdataset: Subswath along with polarization and Calibration combinations. Single Band Pros: Flexibility for user to select any combination Cons: Too many subdatasets Option 2: (Preferred) Subdataset: Combination of swath and polarisation Bands: Sigma, Beta, Gamma & Uncalibrated Bands Pros: Lesser Subdatasets. Fixed Band Combinations Option 3: Subdataset: Each swath Bands: Combination of Calibration and Polarization. Cons: Too many subdatasets, lesser flexibility -Augustus -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Calibration-updates-for-Sentinel-1-Driver-for-GDAL-tp5307729.html Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
