Recently seen that GDALRasterBand read for the Mosaics is affected because
the read always trying to default to IReadBlock and we never implemented
IReadBlock because of less generic type support I guess:

our implementation : 
class XRasterBand : public GDALRasterBand
{
  
 public:
  XRasterBand(GDALDataset          *dataset,
                 int                   gdalBandNum,
                 const xyzSize<uint32> &rastersize,
                 const xyzSize<uint32> &blocksize,
                 GDALDataType          gdalDatatype,
                 GDALColorInterp       colorInterp_,
                 const xyzTransferGuard<GDALColorTable> &ctbl_,
                 bool                  haveNoData_,
                 double                noDataValue_);
  virtual CPLErr IRasterIO( GDALRWFlag eRWFlag,
                            int nXOff, int nYOff, int nXSize, int nYSize,
                            void *pData, int nBufXSize, int nBufYSize,
                            GDALDataType eBufType,
                            int nPixelSpace, int nLineSpace,
                            GDALRasterIOExtraArg* sExtraArg);

  virtual CPLErr IReadBlock(int nXBlockOff, int nYBlockOff, void *pabyData){
   CPLError(CE_Failure, CPLE_AppDefined,
             "Internal Error: doesn't support block reading");
    return CE_Failure;
  }

Since we recently upgraded to GDAL 2.1.2 from GDAL 1.1 all the Raster reads
are defaulting to IReadBlock for warping /mosaics.

I referred to Migration Guide, but it does not mention of such a change(
even the RasterIO RFC is unrelated) - ref
:https://svn.osgeo.org/gdal/branches/2.0/gdal/MIGRATION_GUIDE.TXT

My Question is :
1. has anyone seen this issue ? 
2. what has changed that may not be documented ?
3. is there a need to implement IReadBlock 2.0 onwards ?




--
View this message in context: 
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Change-of-behavior-GDALRasterBand-IReadBlock-vs-RasterIO-tp5305401.html
Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to