Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com> writes:
>> Would you expect a C++ ABI change every release?
>
> Except for bugfixes releases, in practice yes for the yearly "feature"
> release
> ("feature" meaning here a change of major or minor in the "GDAL
> major.minor.micro" scheme), as adding a new capability / virtual method, or a
> new optional parmeter, etc... changes the C++ ABI.This seems to be the collision between C ABI stability and C++ ABIs that I expected. I think that argues for separating them; things in C++ seem to essentially have to rebuild on most changes, where C isn't like that. (I tend to look after gdal in pkgsrc, but I haven't run into this yet.)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
