Le mardi 03 mai 2016 18:23:47, Jeff McKenna a écrit : > On 2016-05-03 4:54 AM, Even Rouault wrote: > >> -EXTRAFLAGS = -I$(HDF5_DIR)\include -DWIN32 -D_HDF5USEDLL_ > >> +EXTRAFLAGS = -I$(HDF5_DIR)\include -DWIN32 > >> -DH5_BUILT_AS_DYNAMIC_LIB > > > > Jeff, > > > > does the above match your experience ? We could probably define both > > _HDF5USEDLL_ and H5_BUILT_AS_DYNAMIC_LIB to address different versions. > > > > I see in https://www.hdfgroup.org/windows/faq.html that _HDF5USEDLL_ is > > still advised. > > Hi Even, > > I only set -D_HDF5USEDLL in /frmts/hdf5/makefile.vc and I don't have any > issues compiling GDAL against HDF5-1.8.16
If you have the opportunity, it would be good if you could check if defining both _HDF5USEDLL_ and H5_BUILT_AS_DYNAMIC_LIB doesn't affect negatively your builds. Ideally, we'd like to have a default set of compilation flags that works out of the box for (almost) everybody. > > It likely comes down to how HDf5 is compiled (the cmake settings), which > again calls for everyone to be sure to make sure these notes are > recorded on the buildhints page (which by all the discussion here > lately, that page should be getting lots and lots of edits lately - > that's a strong nudge from me to everyone). > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/HDF > > -jeff -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
