Le mardi 26 mai 2015 10:13:49, Tamas Szekeres a écrit : > Hi Ari, > > I haven't tried to compile that with mono for quite a long time. I'll give > it a try. > > However we did not follow the latest changes in the SWIG implementation > with the bindings, so I'd try with an earlier version (ie. 1.3.39) to > generate the wrappers.
I can confirm that I can compile the CSharp bindings on Linux with SWIG 1.3.40 (and run the tests), but I get the same error as Ari with SWIG 2.0.X As far as I know, Java and Python bindings build and run equaly well with SWIG 1.3.40 or 2.0.X (although there's a Unix makefile hack to have Python 3.2 compat, conditionnaly applied with SWIG 1.3.40, that is no longer needed with SWIG 2.0.4 or later) > May be we should consider including the generated > wrappers in gdal instead of let the users to use different versions with > different results. It would be good if we could have a common SWIG version that works for all the bindings. So currently it seems to be 1.3.40 ? Regarding putting the generated wrappers in SVN, that's already what we do for Python. We could also just include the generated wrappers in the tarballs. Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
