Yes, that’s what ‘f’ is. It could just be that on a database with N-hundred tables the query would be slow regardless. Something I’ll do a quick test of. I’m writing up a few variants to go into those slots for different versions. P
-- http://postgis.net http://cleverelephant.ca On March 18, 2015 at 10:09:26 AM, Sandro Santilli (s...@keybit.net) wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:58:20AM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: > > > There’s also a couple new relation types, ‘m’ for materialized > > views and ‘f’ for… gah! I don’t know. > > I think 'f' is for foreign data tables. > > It's surprising that joining a view on catalogue tables considerably > slows down. Shouldn't the optimizer be able to rewrite the query > to skip redundancies ? > > --strk; > > () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer > /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html > _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev