Even, I have (finally) looked over the RFC and I'm super pleased. I couldn't find anything I wanted to argue against, and it all looks excellent to me though I could imagine some some bumps in real world use.
Feel free to call for a motion when you are ready. Best regards, Frank On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Even Rouault <even.roua...@mines-paris.org > wrote: > Le jeudi 08 mai 2014 00:13:22, Even Rouault a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > This is a call for discussion on "RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification" > > > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification > > > > No reaction : no interest or no time to review yet ? > Or should I move that forward ? > But I'd prefer if such architectural changes could be a bit reviewed... > > > Best regards, > > > > Even > > -- > Geospatial professional services > http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > -- ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Software Developer
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
