Even Rouault <even.rouault <at> mines-paris.org> writes: ...
> > In light of this, it may be better to use an xml or textual representation > > and embed it inside an XMP block, which is supported for many formats[1]. > > Also it would allow for easier human-reading. > > Yes, that's one possibility. Which comes back to GMLJP2 unless there are other > standards... > > I'd want to build on something that is a "real" standard or a de-facto > standard, but not reinvent everything from scratch. What GMLJP2 gives as a bonus is the axis order trouble and not totally clear interpretation if origin is in the centre (probably it is) or in the corner of a pixel, and rectified grid does not support ground control points. Thus GMLJP2 is at least not better in everything, it has also drawbacks. -Jukka Rahkonen- _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
