On Apr 20, 2014, at 4:39 AM, Even Rouault <even.roua...@mines-paris.org> wrote:
>> Well, you could try leaving out the os.uname test. clang is clang no matter >> what version of OS X, and it wouldn't hurt to include the option when it's >> already default. Also, testing the OS version doesn't necessarily say what >> clang version is installed. > > Could you try leaving out test os.uname test ? It is inspired from the link I > found where they say that clang began the default compiler with Darwin >= 11. > Ideally we shouldn't break building for folks using GCC. > Actually, the os.uname test works for me. I have OS X 10.8.5 (uname version 12.5.0) and Xcode 5.1 (clang 5.1). Maybe there is something weird in the Travis system. ----- William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos*at*kyngchaos*dot*com> http://www.kyngchaos.com/ "Time is an illusion - lunchtime doubly so." - Ford Prefect _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
