2013/4/21 Even Rouault <even.roua...@mines-paris.org> > There's nothing wrong in the GetFeature output. It is completely legitimate > and usual to have a gml:Box inside a gml:boundedBy. > The DescribeFeatureType is also valid, but it could be made more specific by > reporting type="gml:SurfacePropertyType" instead of > type="gml:GeometryPropertyType"
I see. To me GetCapabilities of http://http://maps.zh.ch/wfs/FnsNSWFS should also be more specific. Currently there's no geometry hint (and it even issues warnings about missing EXTENT). So,given it's DescribeFeatureType would report type="gml:SurfacePropertyType" would the WFS reader of GDAL work? I thought, most WFS clients/converters read GetCapabilities, not DescribeFeatureType. Yours, Stefan 2013/4/21 Even Rouault <even.roua...@mines-paris.org> > Le dimanche 21 avril 2013 22:18:38, Stefan Keller a écrit : > > Hi Even > > > > You're right about the parantheses of URLs with & in the shell. > > > > 2013/4/21 Even Rouault <even.roua...@mines-paris.org> > > > > > So the geometry type is undefined. OGR then reports a unknown geometry > > > > type. > > > > > There could be a mix of geometries in such a layer. > > > > Yes that's it. > > To be specific, every feature/object/instance has a gml:Box and a > > gml:Polygon (see below). > > That's a weird output from this ArcGIS server stuff and an incomplete > > response of DescribeFeatureType. > > There's nothing wrong in the GetFeature output. It is completely legitimate > and usual to have a gml:Box inside a gml:boundedBy. > The DescribeFeatureType is also valid, but it could be made more specific > by > reporting type="gml:SurfacePropertyType" instead of > type="gml:GeometryPropertyType" >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
