Hi Ivan,
I orthorectify such products with comparable with Envi results. But,
exist TIL driver usually have SRS WGS84 and output raster lost in
resolution on Y Axis. I correct driver and commit it (see ticket #3482
for details). Everything should be OK.
Also you need to add RPC_HEIGHT with some value to correct geoid.
http://translate.google.ru/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=ru&ie=UTF-8&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fgis-lab.info%2Fqa%2Forbview3-ortho-gdal.html&act=url
Best regards,
Dmitriy
09.02.2013 3:33, Ivan Lucena пишет:
Hi there,
Does anybody has ever tried to orthorectify an "Ortho Ready Standard"
QuickBird image with .TIL files?
To whom might be interested, there is a couple of sample data on
digitalglobe.com and you can always find DEM on USGS.COM.
Contrary to GDAL standards :) in most of those sample dataset the .RPB
file are not directed associated to the Geotiff file. Like in
some_file_name.tif
some_file_name.rpb
That is usually the case when the scene covered is too big and the
data provider decided to dived it on tiles.
The .TIL file describe the offsets in lines/pixel/X/Y of each of the
tiles and the .RPB is related to the .TIL file. Like in:
some_file_t1.tif
some_file_t2.tif
some_file_t3.tif
some_file_name.til
some_file_name.rpb
Since GDAL does not support the .TIL file, what one needs to do is to
use gdalbuildvrt to create a VRT to represent the same tilling as the
.TIL file.
At that point it is still not ready to do orthorectification yet
because gdalwarp doesn't seems to digest the combination .VRT .RPB.
some_file_name.vrt
some_file_name.rpb
But that is just a matter of converting the VRT to GTIFF and go ahead
and run:
gdalwarp some_file_name.tif the_output_name.tif -rpc -to
RPC_DEM=the_dem_file.tif -t_srs EPSG:32610
But after all that I can't see much more accuracy when overlaying a
vector road map on top of the original non-orthorectified than over
the orthorectified output. It is a little bit better in some places
but worse in some others.
I found much better results with datasets without tilling. I mean,
without .TIL files. Just one GTIFF and one .RPB
Has anybody had that same experience?
Do we have plans to support the .TIL file in GDAL?
Best regards,
Ivan
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
