+1 for 1.10 Etienne
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Howard Butler <hobu....@gmail.com> wrote: > +0 Howard > > I don't like that we're changing the version macro and changing our > versioning pattern 10+ years down the road. Assumptions about > GDAL_VERSION_NUM are likely baked in many places, and this is going to cause > some (albeit minor) pain. > > There's no right way though, it's just a choice. My personal preference is to > call it 2.0. > > Howard > > On Nov 12, 2012, at 1:54 PM, Frank Warmerdam <warmer...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> +1 Frank >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Even Rouault <even.roua...@mines-paris.org> >> wrote: >> Motion: The next major GDAL version released from trunk will be called >> GDAL/OGR 1.10. >> >> To take into account 2-figure numbers in the components of the version >> number, >> the GDAL_VERSION_NUM macro will be changed accordingly as : >> >> # define GDAL_VERSION_NUM >> (GDAL_VERSION_MAJOR*1000000+GDAL_VERSION_MINOR*10000+GDAL_VERSION_REV*100+GDAL_VERSION_BUILD) >> >> A new macro will be added so that users don't have to do all the above >> multiplications : >> >> #define GDAL_COMPUTE_VERSION(maj,min,rev) >> (maj*1000000+min*10000+rev*100) >> >> (Note: as raised by Mateusz, I've dropped the 'build' argument in the macro, >> since it has never been used in the past and it is unlikely code would depend >> on that) >> >> ---- >> >> Hi, >> >> Not surprisingly when it is related to preferences on version numbering, the >> previous discussion thread has not lead to a clear consensus on the topic, >> but >> we need to make a decision soon so that users can anticipate the adaptations >> needed in their code. >> >> 1.10 seems the more logical option to me, even if that implies changing the >> way we compute GDAL_VERSION_NUM, which I don't anticipate to cause problems >> to >> existing code. There are also a few existing documentation pages in drivers >> or >> utilities that mention GDAL 2.0 that will need to be changed, but I'll take >> care of this if the motion is approved (some sed magic should do this). >> >> +1 Even >> _______________________________________________ >> gdal-dev mailing list >> gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >> >> >> >> -- >> ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- >> I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com >> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam >> and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Software Developer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gdal-dev mailing list >> gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
