Personally I like the idea. I'd probably go for the flattened version
unless there is a good reason to carry a bunch of sub-directories around.
If there are any serious arguments against doing this then I'd like to
hear them.
Daniel
On 11-11-03 05:31 PM, Mateusz Łoskot wrote:
On 3 November 2011 21:24, David Burken<dbur...@comcast.net> wrote:
Just wondering if you've thought about namespacing the include paths? That
is:
#include "cpl_config.h"
#include "gdal_frmts.h"
Becomes:
#include<gdal/port/cpl_config.h>
#include<gdal/gcore/gdal_frmts.h>
Or (flattened):
#include<gdal/cpl_config.h>
#include<gdal/gdal_frmts.h>
David,
I thoroughly agree.
Here is related ticket: http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3435
IMHO, current way of installing headers is becoming inconvenient and
unacceptable...
I realize this would be a big change. Just thought since you're taking the
plunge on cmake it's something to consider.
Yes, but I'm not a decision maker.
I can only encourage to collect more critical mass and nudge GDAL PSC
about this idea.
Best regards,
--
Daniel Morissette
http://www.mapgears.com/
Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
