Folks, I've been dragging my feet on release for a couple weeks now because I'm uncertain about the OGR 64 bit RFC. Rather than vacillate into new year, I would like to defer it to 1.9 and start a beta program. Are there any objections to me producing a "beta 1" this weekend? My hope is that we could have a release candidate available for January 1st after a 2-3 betas. I realize we are essentially into the holiday period now and that not everyone will have time to do testing but I hesitate to let things drag on endlessly.
Do folks think it is desirable to have a release oriented meeting next week, or should we just discuss by email, proceed through a few betas and then to a release candidate? We haven't formalized a concept of release manager and process to the degree it has been done for MapServer. But unless someone else really wants to do it, I'm prepared to act as release manager for 1.8. Adoption of a release candidate as a formal release would be done by PSC vote as we do for point releases. In theory it would be nice to have a PSC vote on a release schedule and appointment of a release manager but I'm afraid that might set us back timewise. However, if there are objections to proceeding more directly I'm willing to do so. Best regards, -- ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
